Problem Number Four: The Secret Influence of Social Media
They want you to keep scrolling so they will only show content that is relevant (or what the algorithm thinks is most relevant) to your interests. These platforms have complex algorithms that analyse user behaviour, predict interests and serve content to keep users browsing longer. On the face of it, this may seem like something good but actually its implications for society are worrying.
The Echo Chamber Effect
Social media can create echo chambers, and they are a huge part of the problem. These are settings in which individuals only get exposed to information that coincides with their current convictions and thoughts. Social media algorithms are designed to more often show you content that they think will engage the users — which typically means showing those same people things with which they agree. This can create a myopic view that only supports our preexisting biases and makes it hard to see otherwise
According to a 2020 Princeton University study, echo chambers generated by use of social media are directly responsible for polarization in politics. However, the study showed that users clicking on such content end up getting more of it — creating a self-reinforcing cycle where diverse and opposing worldviews are shut off. There are broader implications for democracy as well, dividing even further and discouraging the kinds of discussions that may be possible.
The Spread of Misinformation
That is another important issue and the rush of misinformation on social media. Social media sites compete for clicks and likes, so often the most sensational or controversial posts get more play even if it is wrong. As a result, false information has the potential to be widely circulated since people are more inclined to share content that evokes emotion.
False news spreads faster and wider than true news on social media, according to a 2018 MIT study called “The Spread of True and False News Online.” The research based on Twitter data showed that the likelihood of false information being retweeted is 70 percent higher than accurate content. This is yet another reason why algorithms that curate our social media feeds for us are bad, because it only keeps promoting false stories into the public while muddles proper information.
Agitate: The Tangible Ripple Effects of Social Media Power
Social media affects not just the pages of websites but also everyday behaviour and societal norms. The impact of social media on society is a broad ranging theme which goes beyond just the emotional consequences and extends to mental health, relationships among people in real life context also extending influence over democratic processes.
Mental Health Concerns
When people are always being assaulted with curated content on places like social media, it can easily become a drain that leads to unhealthy minds. The ebb and flow of appropriate information is something that has been built into social media; this can cause people to check their feeds compulsively and for hours, which in turn may increase anxiety. Sites that favour content based on what you have interacted with in the past can lead to a constant comparison and validation loop where every user is chasing for likes, comments, shares etc.
Social Media Platforms:
Adolescents who reported using social media such as Facebook, guess what? … they have higher incidence of depression and anxiety to get, you should. Showing Then to Be an Addictive Behaviour — That People Are Attracted to Content That Makes Them Have Emotional Responses, … This has sparked widespread calls for more transparency and tighter regulation of social media to limit its effects on mental health.
Guy Standing sees the growth of a global precariat in what he terms a book by Andre gorse as communities continue to fragment.
This focus on online friendship over real life face-to-face relationships can also impact the degree to which users are socializing in general. If users spend too much time on social media, they may lose touch with their local communities. This can result in an isolation or loneliness, because for one thing face-to-face interaction has depth that is often hard to convey online with people you meet.
In an unnamed survey of more than 14,000 at least half were satisfied in terms of the quality if their interactions (83%) but rather critical when it came to tandems between people on the whole: Between Facebook and TikTok, nine-out-of-ten commenting that social media has a terrible effect. Comments from U.S.-based adults in Pew Research Center may reveal why; here’s what they said earlier this year of about one topic alone: Concerns about social media activity being unengaged, monologue rather than dialogue; with partisan echo chambers filled only by sliding scale monocrats and slipstream cranks has now infected productive use for mythic purposes.
Implication for Democracy Process:
Another area of worry is the effect social media has on democratic processes. Social media Affect Political Polarization: As we know the social media is powerful which can feed your viewpoint to be even more extreme in echo chambers. That can in turn undercut democracy itself by frustrating attempts at civic discussion and decision-making based on shared reality.
2016 U.S Presidential election is a prominent case study where social media led public perceptions. The Oxford Internet Institute released findings that demonstrated social media had been abused to disseminate fake news and engage in voter suppression efforts. The study concluded that targeted political ads based on social media profiling allowed for false information to spread and even influenced the election result.
The Solution: A More Human Social Media Experience
Hence, dealing with the problems of social media requires a whole society effort which includes individuals and policymakers but also yes digital platforms as well. We can also start to develop a more wellness-focused & ethical social media ecosystem by deploying user-centric and transparency driven solutions.
Advocating For Social Media Transparency
Transparency is one of the key aspects to consort within curbing down bad impacts of social media. Understand how social media works and what influences you to see a specific content. One-way social media companies can do this is by giving users more control over what content they see on their feed.
For instance, Facebook brought in “Why Am I Seeing This? A User Feed consists of some specific posts, and why those particular posts are shown to a user Nonetheless, steps can be taken to empower users more with respect to their experience online. Offering users the option of muting social media and promoting content that they like is good for giving some power back to regular people auditing their lives online. For more information read these refrences,Social media transparency resources: —Privacy Rights. Facebook Transparency Approach: https://transparency.fb.com/features/feed/ EFF’s Guide to Figure out How: https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2019/04/social-media-should-make-algorithmic-timeline-optional
Encouraging Digital Literacy
Another potential answer to social media challenges is providing the users with more digital literacy. We should hope that users know how social media and platforms work (in a formalist sense) such as the roles of intermediary’s context or biases rather than whether they may hop from site to meme in search only for emotional confirmation. A social media-savvy generation should take solid foundations of digital literacy in its earliest years that can only be established through education-related programs included and incorporated to the curricula.
Common Sense Media also has some pretty great resources for digital literacy, including lesson plans and activities that allow students to engage in critical evaluation of the content they find online. In fact, by creating a culture of digital literacy we can equip people to both know the difference between actual and fake information as well make them unbreakable social media manipulation defenders.
Controlling the social media platforms
While I recognize the significance of individual actions and educational initiatives, addressing these harms requires structural or regulatory relief to address social media’s societal effects more broadly. Social media platforms make up a new age of public forum, and governments/policymakers could control to improve the common good.
Interest in regulating social media has surged over the last decade, spurred by privacy and data concerns as well as alarmist views that online news distorts democracy. The model of the European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) shows it is possible to use regulatory frameworks for protecting consumers and transparency. Efforts are under way in other parts of the world as well promoting legislation that would render social media platforms liable for content they sponsor — such as lawmakers in U.S.Also read these resources for more information on the regulatory landscape: GDPR Guidelines of the EU: https://ec.europa.eu/info/law/law-topic/data-protection/eu-data-protection-rules_en Civic on Social Media Regulation in the U.S.: https://www.civic.org/social-media-regulation-us
Promoting Ethical Social Media Designs
And third, we have a parallel responsibility: to demand better design from the social media platforms on which so much of our democracy now depends. Among these are tackling problems related to bias, misinformation and user wellness. Platforms can change their incentive structure to prioritize social media experiences that are built on principles of ethical design which lead to more and better human scale connection, not just growing the numbers.
What makes Instagram less harmful than before comes from the roots — perhaps we should jump on developing what’s called as a “human-centred” social media that puts individual well-being over third party metrics. Twitter, for example has tested down-ranking tweets that violate platform rules. At the same time, Instagram added new tools that could help you to limit usage and exposure to potentially harmful content.
This way, social media companies are able to design their platforms with ethics in mind while creating a fairer and more balanced online ecosystem. Activities that are specifically designed to promote trust in the platform among users and prevent malign social outcomes.
Conclusion
Social media and their impact on society have a deep prospective attitude. On the one hand, social media is a powerful tool for delivering personalized content which could improve user experience but on the other hand it creates problematic uses like echo-chambers that support misinformation and destroys natural relationships. With transparency, education, regulation and ethical design we can start to address these problems and make digital landscape behave according to the society.
Needless to say, social media can no longer be ignored from the equation of life and by golly any power it might have over collective civilization. We can make sure that social media IS a power for good in our globally connected world by taking proactive measures to reduce their potential damage.
0 Comments